.
Wow. What a dust up last night on my radio show! In spite of my better judgement, I touched the figurative third rail of discussion topics: Illegal Immigration. As a recovering former red meat thrower who is well acquainted with how easily talk radio audiences can be stirred up, I try not to relapse to the old (but highly effective) ways of generating an audience via controversy. But this is one of those topics on which very few people have lukewarm feelings.
I'd like to share an email that I received from my final caller on last night's show. Craig is one of the smartest people I know; a scientist in every sense of the word. But he was really taking me to the woodshed last night on my stance on illegal immigration. I'm sharing this email to help illustrate the divide that exists between people who are ostensibly on the SAME SIDE of the battle for freedom.
My responses appear in red:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 5:56 AM, Craig S----- wrote:
Bryan,
First, thank you for hosting the forum!
I feel like I should apologize for my outburst at the end of the Forum Monday, but I can't, yet... You are right, I and others are scared to death, that we are allowing America to be destroyed. You contend that we, the over-reacting, are falling prey to the conservativehate mongers... The Sarah Palins, the Rush Limbaughs, the Glen Becks.... people who talk with America every day...
We can trust them, right? |
First of all let me apologize if I have treated you unfairly. I'd like to address the specific points you've made in this e-mail. I do believe there is a great deal of over-reaction to illegal immigration, Muslims, and other "enemies-at-the-gate" that are used to keep us fearful and our attention focused on something other than the underlying principles. Please note that I never named names or called the above listed individuals hate-mongers, those are your words. It is interesting that you would name the people you did. These people do talk to America every day and on some matters they speak truth, on others they lack sound principles. How many Americans know the difference and how many just parrot what is being said?
Some of us are so frustrated with the sophomoric arguments that we should be patient and tolerant, while all around us, America is being dismantled at warp speed! If our goal is to slow or stop the dismantling of America, then why would we seek solutions that further empower an out of control government and diminish the rule of law? Internal passports (national ID), impregnible walls, and inward-focused border security are the hallmarks of totalitarian states. Illegal immigration is but ONE symptom of a systematic dismantling that has been going on for 150 years.
National government or Federal Government? |
Instead of helping us find real solutions, you chide us for trying... for expecting that we can do something. You effectively ask us todo nothing, as though the problem will solve itself.
I chide those who are seeking short-term gratification without considering the long-term consquences of their actions. Carelessly thought-out, hastily applied solutions that move us closer to a police state are not acceptable. To portray my misgivings about such actions as asking that nothing be done is a false dilemma logical fallacy. Our choices are not limited to "do this" or "do nothing at all." As I said last night, we cannot solve a problem that we do not understand and it's clear that many Americans do not understand the principles of good government that are at stake here.
When you speak in condemning tones of people wanting to close the door, to force foreigners, of unknown intent, to ask to get in, you talk as though you have the solution... Have you?, or are you just giving an excuse to not DO anything personally? You act as though we were profiling, for the sake of making someone's life miserable. When a criminal is found to be an illegal alien, we are simply asking his home country take care of the problem instead of us! Our jails are full of other people's problems. Our social services are full of other people's problems, and we are being forced, to our severe detriment, to deal with them. Are we helping criminals by jailing them here? Are we helping the poor by giving handouts here? You know the answer, so why do you tolerate an ever expanding round of the same insanity? The solution I've offered is one that those who are emotionally invested in this debate do not wish to hear. It's very simple: Prosecute those whose actual behavior has criminal ramifications. Whether that person is an American citizen or an illegal alien, they should be held to the law so long as there is an actual evil act involved (Mala en Se) where there is a clear victim rather than a breach of some administrative rule (Mala Prohibita). If convicted of a crime in Idaho, you'd serve your time in Idaho, so why shouldn't someone convicted of a crime in the U.S. serve their time here and then be deported?
Many of us are running out of resources to fight this onslaught. The Elitists, that you ask us to be patient with, have money and power and are crushing the middle class, by killing the economy and putting us out of work Soon we will join the ranks of the poor in a much expanded slave class, the elites are creating for us. It seems like you see yourself immune to this fate... Is it because you have walked in our shoes and have found the better way, or has your liberal education caused you to think that you have become part of the privileged elite, that can make pronouncements on the rest of us, and escape the whirlwind that this insane set of policies is bringing to us all? Nowhere will you find me defending the elitists who we have allowed to bring our nation to ruin. I'm surprised you would even make such an accusation, Craig. One thing the elitists have working in their favor is how easily the American public can be stirred up and misdirected to focus their anger upon people who have nothing to do with implementing the policies that are destroying America. And the illegal immigration fervor with its clamor for loosening the restrictions on government power in order to "solve" the problem is a perfect example of what Montesquieu referred to as a "tyranny that is self-administered by its victims." Don't accuse me of being one of "them" for not buying into this deception.
He honestly thought we'd stay informed |
You suggest tolerance toward the bigoted and intolerant, that are rushing in. In war, as we now have (psychologically), the victory goes to the one with the better strategy. They bring weapons, and you suggest we do what? Let them come and do as they please, with absolutely no resistance? You are not living in the real world! (I guess you have never met a really twisted or evil person. You don't seem to comprehend how meaningless your life is to such people! History is filled with such individuals that would readily sacrifice all of humanity for their evil designs, without batting an eye. Often their "reasons" sound somehow logical or reasonable, but the results have always been mayhem!) Nowhere have I defended the bigoted or intolerant on either side of the illegal immigration issue, but I have clearly cautioned that we don't destroy our own liberties in an effort to vanquish our enemies. Is the "real world" one in which we can safely discard our morality and foundational principles to ensure that the means are justified by the ends?
The ultimate pragmatist |
The recipe, you seem to purvey, is one of acquiescence, or total conquest for America! Perhaps you think that God will fight our battles? History proves that God helps none that will not help themselves. What does it profit a man (or a nation) if they lose their souls in order to gain a short term political victory? That's not the same thing as simply giving up; but it does recognize that there are eternal, not just temporal, principles at stake. God does help those who help themselves, but it's a long shot to expect him to help those who would violate or abandon correct principles deliberately.
I am sorry, that as fellow lovers of America, we don't see eye-to-eye on some things, but I am not ready to see people condemned for trying, unless you truly have a more effective way, while most of America just sits on their haunches and kibitz...Let's stick with keeping government in its proper role of administering protective law (which addresses actual crimes with victims) and not preventative law (which limits liberty pre-emptively) for starters. Let whatever reforms to immigration law are required flow from that foundational premise.
With enough fear, this becomes acceptable |
It works on people too |
There is a side to life, that you seem to be refusing to see. Maybe you should go to some council meetings and see how the "rubber meets the road," for power people. ...Maybe work in a homeless shelter for a while , to see how other people cope, or don't? ...Maybe try to live behind an iron curtain. Craig, what do you actually know of my personal life and personal efforts to move the cause of liberty? You've resorted to questioning my motives when you don't have any real first hand knowledge of what I'm doing, who I meet with or what meetings I attend.
We are so blessed in America, and we don't even comprehend what it is, that we are losing, or how to stop the loss!!!! Spot on! But we don't stop the loss by abandoning essential principles of liberty. Anger isn't enough to turn the tide, Craig. Each of us bears an individual responsibility to develop the best personal character and understanding of liberty that we can. This is the route I've chosen to take and I believe it is far more impactful than the lower road of anger that too many prefer.
Your Friend,
- Craig S------
PS: WE are fighting principalities and powers... (Let us hope it is not wooden spears against cruise missiles! Satan never fought a fair battle.) Pray for America, and let us work as though it all dependes on us.
Just because we disagree on certain points doesn't mean that I esteem you as an enemy, but I will stand for what I believe to be right even if it offends people whom I respect. Thanks for taking the time to correspond with me.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteBryan:
ReplyDeleteThanks for including the correspondence. If I may, I would add a little to the dialogue beginning with the poem on the statue of liberty,
Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame,
With conquering limbs astride from land to land;
Here at our sea-washed, sunset gates shall stand
A mighty woman with a torch, whose flame
Is the imprisoned lighting, and her name
Mother of Exiles. From her beacon hand
Glows world-wide welcome; her mild eyes command
The air-bridged harbor that twin cities frame.
“Keep, ancient lands, your storied pomp!” cries she
With silent lips. “Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore,
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tost to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door”
Keep...your storied pomp!...Give me your...wretched refuse. And the only real criteria, "yearning to breathe free."
We (our predecessors) created the greatest nation on earth out of the refuse similar to the kind that is crossing from the south. Our policy since then has radically shifted. We now gladly receive the pomp and close the door to those "yearning to breathe free." Which is better great nation-making policy??? All reason, academic training (both anthropological and sociological) would suggest that the current policy is better. I go with the evidence of history.
As a practical matter, you will NEVER be able to stop the flow of those seeking a better life. East Germany and Cuba could not and cannot stop the exit and we CANNOT stop the entrance until there is less opportunity here than there is there. The disconnect we suffer is the abysmal policy that is that ignores economic reality and, more fundamentally, the basic nature of human beings to yearn for freedom. You could expand government to the point that you could hire 100,000 boarder agents and build fences higher, longer an deeper, and you would, by doing so, add to the massive federal control ofAmerican lives through taxation, bureaucracy, and debt. Also, If you want to win elections, you will not be able to do so in the future without latino votes. Read Barney Jackson's piece at http://summalogica.com/?s=november+cow. I do not advocate any compromise of core principles, I only that current policy that 180 degrees off track from core principles.
Finally, Craig runs the danger of losing the argument by elevating emotion. His email contains several logical fallacies that are the result of the emotional overrun (you already pointed out the false dichotomy fallacy). It is similar (though with much more decorum) to the emotion expressed in the following video. http://www.pjtv.com/?cmd=mpg&mpid=105.
I wonder what Jean val Jean would say.
Interesting dialogue. An individual once said that the argument in America can be divided into people who love freedom and those who don't. The people who don't only have to damage freedom in anyway possible and thus any action towards that end is one which they will support. On the other hand, those who are in support of freedom have the much more difficult task of figuring out the correct principals upon which freedom truly rests, and finding the proper way to induct them into society. Through a myriad of avenues, the least of which is legislation.
ReplyDeleteThe only problem with those who seek after freedom is the dogmatic stance which they take in defending their own ideals to the point of damaging those around them who are truly seeking the same ends. If we fail freedom in America, it will be because of a united opposition to freedom working virulently, and the petty squabbling of emotionally laden liberty minded people who don't know what a principal is let alone how to properly implement it.