Friday, August 20, 2010

Parallels

The practice of invoking a comparison between your opponent's argument and Nazi ideology is such a common occurrence in internet discussions that, years ago, an author and attorney named Mike Godwin coined a tongue-in-cheek adage known as "Godwin's Law."
This is you when you disagree with me
Strictly speaking, this tactic constitutes an informal fallacy in that it relies upon hyperbole in an attempt to derail a person's arguments via guilt by association.  I'll be the first to admit that it is overused.  A case in point is how the president of any nation that refuses to submit to the demands of our own national policy makers is invariably labeled as "the next Hitler."  As the political ramp up to a war with Iran continues, we'll all have plenty of opportunity to see this practice in action.

The sad thing about Godwin's Law is that legitimate comparisons can be drawn between 1930's Germany and the American populace today.  That's not the same thing as saying that our government is led by Nazis or that our leaders are rounding up the undesirables to be systematically exterminated.

It simply means that the same types of trends that blinded Germans to the potential of Adolf Hitler can be found within our society today.  Too many Americans believe that Germans as a whole were arrogant and evil and knew what Hitler was capable of from the very beginning.  But that's not the case at all.

We forget that Germany in the 1930's was a turbulent place economically and politically.  With hyper-inflation ravaging the value of the German mark, a wheelbarrow full of money was required to purchase a mere loaf of bread.  On top of the financial unrest was the fear of takeover by the Bolsheviks who had recently succeeded in turning Russia into a giant Soviet prison camp.  In 1933, a terrorist firebombing of the German Reichstag building added another dimension to the panic felt by many German citizens.
Burning of the Reichstag
On top of all this fear of economic distress, communism and terrorism, were the humiliating terms of the Treaty of Versailles which was still punishing the Germans for their part in the First World War.  With their dignity in tatters and encompassed by trouble on every side, it is understandable that a charismatic leader might come forward, especially if that leader offered strong solutions to the problems vexing Germany.  But in order to accomplish the monumental task of fixing the problems and leading Germany to what many Germans considered its proper status among the nations, that leader would require that the German people trust him with absolute power.

By playing upon their fears, Hitler persuaded the German people to grant him unprecedented power and the long downhill slide to their well documented destruction began.

So where are the parallels in our society?

Our economy is--to put it mildly--on shaky ground thanks to a dollar that has lost over 95% of its purchasing power since 1913 and mounting public and private debts have our markets as twitchy as a tightrope walker juggling hornet nests.  The solution pursued by those who make our nation's monetary policy is to sell more bonds (go further in debt) to the Federal Reserve and have it print more money which will, in turn, further reduce the buying power of the dollar through inflation.  Those industries that have stronger political connections than others (read fascism) are treated to taxpayer-funded bailouts for being "too big to fail."

Since September 11th of 2001, the American people have lived in an unending cycle of fear and a corresponding expansion of government powers to address terrorism abroad while building a garrison state here at home.  Consider that in 2001, we lost just under 3,000 U.S. citizens in the 9/11 attacks, but during that same year homegrown American criminals murdered FOUR TIMES that number.  Statistically your likelihood of dying in a terrorist attack is about the same as that of dying of a spider bite.
A blank check for expanding government power
But when our leaders tell us that they need to spy on our phone calls, e-mails, bank accounts and library transactions, a surprising number of modern Americans fall into line just as their German counterparts did during the ascendency of the Third Reich.  When our government claims power to kidnap, torture, detain indefinitely or even murder American citizens without due process--in the name of fighting terror--many consider it their patriotic duty to support these actions just as the Germans of the 1930's did.

Just as Hitler justified his aggression against other nations as acting in Germany's self defense, too many Americans view any use of military force as automatically righteous and justified without measuring such actions against the standards of Just War.  And just as patriotic Germans shouted down those who questioned Hitler's aggression, self-styled "great Americans" consider it their patriotic duty to silence those who question our leaders' actions.

One of the most telling similarities between Nazi Germany and modern America is a growing acceptance of the practice of marginalizing and dehumanizing a targeted group of people who are blamed for the ills of our nation.  In Germany it was the Jews who bore the brunt of this treatment as German society methodically marked them for destruction, first by innuendo, next by legal sanction and finally by the direct action of rounding them up and exterminating them.  Other groups including gypsies, communists, homosexuals and those with permanent disabilities were labeled as being a danger to the Fatherland and likewise targeted for elimination.

We must remember that the process by which the Final Solution was implemented was as gradual as it was deliberate.  Had Hitler started rounding up the Jews in the spring of 1933 the German people could have quickly discerned what he was doing and withheld their support.  By first carefully sowing seeds of distrust for the Jews and then implementing laws that forbade them to be a legitimate part of German society, the Nazis were able to convince enough Germans that Jews were somehow not really people at all.
From The Boy In the Striped Pajamas
It's easy to picture a majority of German people as possessing a fanatical hatred for the Jews, but in reality it was primarily their calloused indifference that allowed the atrocities of the Third Reich to move forward virtually unopposed.  Too few Germans took the time to give serious thought to the official propaganda they'd been fed regarding the Jews and Hitler's efforts to "defend" the Fatherland.  By the time some Germans realized what was being done in their names, it was too dangerous to speak out.

The current hysteria in America over Muslims in general is disturbingly familiar to those who have studied the methods used to dehumanize the so-called undesirables in 1930's Germany.  The propaganda flows daily from various media sources who are vigorously trying to inflame public opinion against Muslims everywhere, not just those in America.  Thus far the propaganda campaign to convince Americans that Muslims are an existential threat to our nation has succeeded in rousing the right wing through its highly contrived tale of a so-called "Victory Mosque to be built at Ground Zero" of the 9/11 attacks.
If only there were some way to check the facts
Given the vast amounts of information that are readily available to most of us in a matter of milliseconds via our computers or even our cell phones, it's astonishing that so few Americans are willing to challenge the outrageous claims and do even the most rudimentary fact-checking.  Never has information been so easy to come by, and yet the tried and true methods of sowing seeds of distrust, and the urging of legal disenfranchisement are being employed at this moment.


Britt Combs is one of the few who is willing to speak out against the rising tide of anti-Muslim sentiment that is becoming the acid test of who supports liberty and who does not:
I shudder for my country. We're a hair's breadth from a new national socialist republic of America. It sounds absurd, but what can you say when the majority of Americans are absolutely zealous about depriving the basic human rights of their fellow Americans?
You can object; you can say that denying them the right to build mosques on their private property is not the same as rounding them up into camps and gassing them. But how far removed is it? The majority of Germans in the late 1930s had no problem seeing Jews barred from commerce and run out of their homes. They probably wouldn't have approved of the camps and the gassings, but once government learned that the people approved stripping the Jews of their rights, the camps and the killings were a natural progression. All it took was a general contempt among the masses for the Jews' humanity, and government handles the rest. There is a general disregard for the humanity of Muslims in America today.
That's an extreme scenario, granted, but I submit that you cannot use the dehumanizing, exclusionary rhetoric these Republicans have been invoking recently, whipping the uncivilized, unschooled and unsophisticated masses into a vengeful frenzy, without inviting bloodshed.
Surely there were some Germans who, in the early 1930's, refused to fall for the propaganda and the demagoguery and sought to warn their fellow citizens of the long term ramifications of the path their nation was taking.  But too many failed to recognize the emotional manipulation being practiced on them until it was too late for them and for their nation.

When you hear someone opine that Islam is a violent religion bent on overthrowing the world and converting it by the sword, be prepared to ask some follow up questions; even if only to yourself.  Ask yourself, "Who has killed more people in the last 100 years, governments or Islamic terrorists?"  Before you answer, check the numbers provided by political scientist R.J. Rummel in his studies on Democide-or death by government.  I don't want to spoil the surprise, but it's surprisingly lopsided with the winner out in front by nearly a quarter of a billion people.

When someone breathlessly informs you that by allowing any mosque to be built in America we are hastening the day that we are all placed under Sharia Law and our Constitution is destroyed.  Be sure to ask "How is a group that comprises less than 1% of the U.S. population is going to pull that off without us realizing it until it's too late?"

If there was ever a time in our nation's history where a propaganda-proof citizenry was needed, this is it.

The greatest danger of making the same mistakes that loyal Germans did during the rise of the Third Reich stems from our arrogant insistence that "it could never happen here."

It is happening here.  And it will happen to us if we don't start thinking instead of looking for an enemy to blame.

11 comments:

  1. Thanks for the article. "95% of its purchasing power". Would you be willing to direct me to where I can learn more? Or do you mind briefly expounding?

    ReplyDelete
  2. There are several great sources to enlighten the reader as to what has happened to our money supply under the influence of the federal reserve. For beginners, I recommend "What ever happened to penny candy?" by Richard Marbury. He has a whole series of books that make complex issues easy to understand.

    For more advanced reading try "The Creature from Jekyll Island by G. Ed Griffin or "Meltdown" by Thomas E. Woods.

    The bottom line is that fiat currencies are not sustainable in the long run. What we pass around as money has no inherent value except what we believe it holds. If we stop believing in the value of paper money, it simply becomes pieces of colored paper again.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The real value of fiat money is Government edict, without it people would not want money that loses value.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Another great source of info is DOLLARS AND SENSE a short video about the history of money...

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1310400834814394856#

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bryan, I have really been enjoying reading your blog and have directed several people to it recently regarding the whole "Mosque at Ground Zero" outrage. I have found increasingly over the years that it is important to check all sides and facts of a media spread fear, outrage, or just in general story. I do not want to be one who is led by ignorance and fear. My husband asked me last night why the Imam for the cultural center at Ground Zero is dedicating the center on 9/11 if he is not a sympathizer for the terrorists that committed the atrocities on 9/11? I am wondering if you know if that is factual and they plan to dedicate it on 9/11 and what your feelings are on that? Also, where do you find the truth in amongst all the lies and media hype?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Didi, I appreciate your sharing this blog with others. I too have heard the rumors that the center was to be dedicated on 9/11 at the exact moment the first plane hit the WTC. I have searched for an authoritative direct quote from Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf where he states as much, but I cannot find such a quote.

    To me, it smacks of rumor-mill hysteria that was made for dissemination among those who aren't in the habit of checking their facts. If someone can show me a direct quote from the Imam or someone in a similar position of authority with the cultural center, I will gladly eat my words. But for now it appears to be a particularly vicious rumor intended to further inflame an outraged public.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Thanks Bryan. That is pretty much what I was thinking. :)

    ReplyDelete
  8. The Reichstag fire, like the 9/11 events, and the 7/7 london bombings, were all stage events of "false-flag" terror designed to create the emotional state within the populace to enable government infringement upon essential liberties of the people. A bold statement to be sure, but one easily supported by the available evidence.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Shane, One thing is obvious. The loss of liberty and further destruction of our once Constitutional Republic due to enemies within has increased since 9/11. Obviously someone was prepared to present THE PATRIOT act. It certainly wasn't written in a day. There was either waiting in opportunistic fashion for a catastrophe or it was planned and intentional events to bring it forward. Historical review shows Government intelligence as creating False flag events as you state, so it would be an unusual event out of line with history if there was not some government involved in 9/11.

    ReplyDelete
  10. It is not the less than 1% of Muslims that live in the U.S. that will pull sharia law on the U.S.. It is the more than 20% of the population of the world that are muslim that will exert the force necessary on the U.S. to force it into Sharia law as we move closer to a One World Order with our endearing President Obama and perhaps others to come.

    A mosque on the 9/11 site is not an expression of freedom and endearment, it is an expression of the symbolism of victory. Sorry Bryan, but, you have missed the point.

    ReplyDelete
  11. If 20% of the world is going to force Islam on us, why haven't they done it already elsewhere? Indonesia has the largest Muslim population in the world, yet they don't force non-believers in their country to convert. Whatever religious dynamic may drive the New World Order, it sure isn't Islam. An excellent resource on this subject is Will Grigg's "Freedom On the Altar".

    The Cordoba House mosque & Islamic center in NYC is 4 city blocks from the site of the Twin Towers. Any symbolism of that particular building project with some supposed victory is based upon a few individual's emotional associations and not the actual words of the Iman behind the project. He (and numerous other Muslim leaders) unequivocally condemned the 9/11 attacks. You can read their comments at this link: http://kurzman.unc.edu/islamic-statements-against-terrorism/

    I don't believe I've missed the point at all.

    ReplyDelete